- Home
-
Legislation
- Friday Five 5-10-19
- Did you Know - Ohio
- Assisted Suicide Advances
- Historic Week in Review
- DeWine Signs Heartbeat Bill
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules it is Constitutional to Defund Planned Parenthood >
- Ban on U.S. Aid to Abortion Providers
- Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
- GTRTL Impact on Law
- Current status of Planned Parenthood >
- Right to Life Action Coalition
- Facts of LIFE
- Legislative Briefing Breakfast
- 3/4 of Aborted Baby Left Inside
- Trump Takes First Step in Defunding PP
- Infanticide: Never Acceptable
- ProMedica Prayer Rally
- Judge Brett Kavanaugh
- Attorney General Mike DeWine files Appeal
- Over 4,000 Mothers Served!
- Ohio Safeguards Down Syndrome Babies
The Myth of Neutrality
The Overwhelming Majority of Ohio Right to Life Affiliates
Are Opposed to SB 165
SB 165 Stated Aim is to Bring Simplification and Clarity to End of Life Directives.
The legislation has not yet been voted on, so there is still time to stop it. Please, take action now and let your legislators know NO on MOLST! The pro-life community is not neutral on SB 165.
The Overwhelming Majority of Ohio Right to Life Affiliates
Are Opposed to SB 165
SB 165 Stated Aim is to Bring Simplification and Clarity to End of Life Directives.
- Senate Bill 165 fails to bring clarity and creates far more questions than it answers.
- The Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) tries to simplify a very complex and dynamic situation into shopping check lists that tilts toward non-treatment instead of providing the care you may need.
- Treatment options are presented as if they are morally neutral even though certain decisions may lead to euthanasia by omission.
- MOLST bases medical decisions on theoretical future scenarios, not the patient's actual condition and needs, which cannot be foreseen with accuracy.
- MOLST is a medical document and the advance directive is a legal one. The MOLST takes effect as soon as it is signed, and the advance directive takes effect only when you are not able to make your own decisions about your health care.
- The MOLST form does not require it be discussed with a physician. The law permits an "issuing practitioner" which includes physician assistant, certified nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist.
- Current law is more than adequate in dealing with end of life directives, while minimizing potential abuse and or facilitating Euthanasia.
The legislation has not yet been voted on, so there is still time to stop it. Please, take action now and let your legislators know NO on MOLST! The pro-life community is not neutral on SB 165.
The Growing *Coalition Opposing Ohio S.B. 165, MOLST Now Includes, as of
May 4, 2016 (alphabetical order):
to add your organization email: mail@affirminglife.org
May 4, 2016 (alphabetical order):
to add your organization email: mail@affirminglife.org
|
|
|
Greater Toledo Right to Life
5726 Southwyck Blvd., Ste. 120 Toledo, Ohio 43614 phone: (419)535-5800 |
- Home
-
Legislation
- Friday Five 5-10-19
- Did you Know - Ohio
- Assisted Suicide Advances
- Historic Week in Review
- DeWine Signs Heartbeat Bill
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules it is Constitutional to Defund Planned Parenthood >
- Ban on U.S. Aid to Abortion Providers
- Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
- GTRTL Impact on Law
- Current status of Planned Parenthood >
- Right to Life Action Coalition
- Facts of LIFE
- Legislative Briefing Breakfast
- 3/4 of Aborted Baby Left Inside
- Trump Takes First Step in Defunding PP
- Infanticide: Never Acceptable
- ProMedica Prayer Rally
- Judge Brett Kavanaugh
- Attorney General Mike DeWine files Appeal
- Over 4,000 Mothers Served!
- Ohio Safeguards Down Syndrome Babies